Game theory is a branch
of economics that assesses outcomes by factoring probabilities of reward and
risk.
Do these “factors” sound
familiar?
1) Federal Reserve.
2) CFTC (Commodities and
Futures Trading Comission).
3) NYSE-Next-LIFFE (the
inter-national [sic] stock market).
The undergirding issue
is the recent high valuation of precious metals. Why have they increased
in value so substantially?
2001-2011: Before the turn of the millennium, US
equities consistently trended higher. This past decade,
however, equities have traded sideways.
1960's-1980's: this was the last period the market traded
range bound.
Market Crashes: 1929, 1937, 1987 and 2007 were years that
witnessed the largest sell offs in equities.
---
I refresh this post with
these generally known facts because they lend context to the most recent years.
Arguably, the height of equities was in the mid part of the
last decade. This preceded the most recent 2007-2008 "crash."
The most material
economic mover in America was "housing." A plethora of new
macro economic reports gained reliance, like the Yale Professor's Case-Schiller
index, which, in essence, aggregates home purchase data.
The ripple effect,
creating a healthy economy, is base around housing booms as services and
products (appliances, fixtures, among others) become more routine as new owners
and lessees "upgrade" their life styles.
This boom, then bust,
also traipsed on the heels of, effectively, two wars. For younger
readers, America long ago abandoned its Constitutional principle of requiring
Congress to declare war (see the Joint War Resolution).
Congress, unlawfully (to
my view), then went on to permit Presidents’ authority to conduct six-month “mini-wars” when they… wait… yes… NO!.. feel
like it.
The Cost of War: 1929 saw the beginning of War World 1.
1937 preceded America's involvement with War World 2.
In both of these cases,
America had to finance its way. In the previous 19th century, America had
been mostly "debt" free before the Civil War. This was the
first war that caused a substantial debt in America. It was eventually paid
in full.
Logic, then, would ask
whether America ever paid off these first two wars. Since the end of
World War 2, America has seen "police actions" (read "war")
in Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Afghanistan,
Iraq-Kuwait, Libya (though not generally admitted) and, to date, interference in Syria.
The Dragon Claim: can you imagine suing the United Nations,
a European President and US Government for property that your
great-great-Grandparents loaned out?
Well. This is what
a few families in Japan and China have done. What do they want?
They demand redress of 1 trillion US dollars because of a wrongful taking
of a financial instrument that evidences a large collateral value based on
underlying gold bullion. Start at page 17 here http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/8408/1934reclamationdragonfa.pdf
If we accept this claim
as true, then we assume that America's previous 19th century assistance with
Japan in defending/evading Chinese conflict created good will for an initial
loan (recall, America carried no debt at this time).
America made use of this
loan so as to create a militia large enough to do successful battle in the War
Worlds.
These loans, instead of
being repaid, were further collateralized into bond notes.
Arguably, the US paper
currency system of a FRN ("Federal Reserve Note") bulk manufacture
arose from this financed arrangement for these wars. Previous to
Democratic President F. Rosevelt's confiscation of gold and silver, most
Americans would pay in gold and silver ounces (though barter was the usual
method of exchange). A gold ounce indicated $20 US dollars, while silver
was a valued at $ 1.
According to this claim,
Kennedy bonds were the next "phase" in America's debtor status so
that it would continue with "police actions" in the 60's. This
time, in south Asia.
The Present State of
War: what would you do
if you might never pay off a debt? What if war is the only answer?
Does war pay?
The (alleged) theft of the Dragon Family
financial instruments indicates it should.
Mortgage Fraud: the US government created securitization
of mortgage loans in the 1970's. In it, brokers oversee the sale of real
estate with bond yields as the investor side of the transaction.
In 2008, the precipice
of the newly unemployed did battle with their mortgage payments, many opted for
strategic default (leave the lender the keys to the house). A
newly elected, political environment encouraged the judicial system (especially
federal and state Attorney Generals) to label these real estate sales
fraudulent (i.e., meaning the banks could not regain possession, let alone
title).
Someone had to pay, but
who was it?
This chart shows the
severity of the losses that banks hemmoraged. 2007-2009 saw a dramatic
loss of valuation in American banks.
This particular fund
(including all major US banks) lost 660%.
Arguably, the most
conflicted profiteers from the last decade's mortgage business either moved
their accounts, or homes, or both.
Here's one excerpt
(http://goo.gl/wYB9O), among many, that details how the Department of Justice
investigated transfer of mortgage proceeds into Switzerland:
SWISS
BANK INDICTED IN THE U.S. FOR FACILITATING TAX FRAUD
The Department of
Justice announced that
on February 2, 2012, Wegelin & Co., a Swiss bank, was indicted for
conspiring with U.S. taxpayers and others to conceal from the IRS more than
$1.2 billion in secret accounts. The Department of Justice alleges that
the conspiracies occurred from 2002 through 2011.
Among other things, the Department of Justice
alleges that in 2008 and 2009, after UBS ceased servicing undeclared accounts
for U.S. taxpayers, Wegelin, sought to acquire those U.S. taxpayers as clients.
In order to do so, they opened and serviced accounts for U.S. taxpayers.
There is, conspicuously,
a significant correlation between the time period that these "tax evasion
conspiracies" occurred and the banking sector, followed by every
other sector lossed material valuation.
UBS is the United Bank
of Switzerland. The short story is that economic sanctions were
threatened against Switzerland, led largely by the US, unless they disclosed
account information.
Eventually, Switzerland
conceded. The "truth" can be viewed in a chart.
Look at the currency
rates between the US dollar and Swiss Franc "CHF".
Spanning from 2000 to
2012, this chart shows that it would have taken almost 2 Francs to get 1 Dollar
in 2000-2002.
Notice when the
"conspiracy" was said to begin from the above excerpt: 2002.
The 2007-2008 crash is
reflected in by the change in the purchase power of the Dollar versus the
Franc.
Ultimately, if 2001 saw
the pinnacle of America's Dollar purchasing power; 2011 indicates the
dreary lows, it means Americans must not pay a dollar, quarter and dime for every one Franc.
---
Returning to the Dragon
Family case, they alleged that the US and UN effectively stole possession of
THEIR financial instrument.
Switzerland!
---CONCLUSION: PUTTING THE PUZZLE PIECES TOGETHER---
2007: the US market crashes.
2008: mortgage "fraud" suits commence.
2009: Federal Reserve beings "Quantitative
Easing". Stock market "rebounds."
2010: gold and silver go "parabolic", gold increased in value from $1,000 to nearly $2,000 (2011) / $ 15-$50
for silver.
2011:
·
Summer:
Greek and Italian Presidents are forced into retirement (fired?).
o
Connections: was (French) IMF President “DSK” forced under criminal scrutiny (before a
critical Presidential election? – politics as usual???).
·
Fall: MF Global files for
bankruptsy protection. While account
holders will likely see a mere nickel for every dollar former US Senator (NJ)
Corzine oversaw. (Now) Former CEO
Corzine has bought a large, French castle during this “scandle.”
o
NOTE: MF clients CANNOT use, access or
withdraw their funds.
- Gold and Silver contracts were the
main commodity account holders intended to take possession of.
- Was MF unable to deliver the precious metal
contracts?
- Winter:
- JP Morgan and Goldman Sacs experience silver contract
shortage.
- CFTC sells all "brick and morter" assets.
Enters into substantially lesser lease arrangement for operations.
- Winter:
- JP Morgan and Goldman Sacs experience silver contract
shortage.
- CFTC sells all "brick and morter" assets.
Enters into substantially lesser lease arrangement for operations.
2012:
- Spring: JP
Morgan announces $ 9 billion loss.
- Summer: SFO
Magazine and PFG CEO Wassendorf, Sr., is investigated for massive
Securities violations - commingling/embezzlement and forgery.
Conclusion: I have attempted to point out the major
factors in this game theory that strategically implements war, institutional
regulation (or, rather, the conflicted dealing by supposed guardians), finance
and hard versus paper assets debate in causal sequence.
The sole linchpin that
holds this bridge, a global narrative, between the 19th through into the 21st
centuries, is that precious metals maintain
value.
As seen, nations and
their currencies, banks and companies come and go.
BUT NOT "GOOD OLD
GOLD."
No comments:
Post a Comment